Rateable value: Could you now be quids in?

Susie Wynne, Willans

Susie Wynne, Willans - Credit: Archant

Business owners developing vacant buildings could find themselves considerably better off, thanks to a new ruling by the Supreme Court. Susie Wynne, of Willans, explains

Property owners and occupiers who are developing vacant commercial premises will be delighted with a recent decision of the Supreme Court.

Until the court’s decision there was some confusion over how commercial premises undergoing development should be valued for rating purposes. There were two possible bases of valuation; the repair assumption or the reality principle.

Normally when the rateable value of a property is assessed, the repair assumption is used. This means that the rateable value of the property is based on the amount of annual rent reasonably obtainable for the property assuming that it is in a state of reasonable repair, excluding any repairs that a reasonable landlord would consider to be uneconomic. Where repairs would not be economic, valuation is based on the annual rent reasonably obtainable for the property in its unrepaired state.

The reality principle means that a property is to be valued based on how it exists on the relevant valuation date, and not by what it once was, or what it may become in future. The principle was created to deal with circumstances where the character or condition of a property is, or is about to be, significantly changed.

The Supreme Court decision involved a case where the first floor of an office building had been vacant since 2006. In 2010 the owners entered into a construction agreement to convert the floor into three separate offices to make it more attractive to potential tenants. The nature of the construction works was extensive, including the removal of the air conditioning system, electrical wiring, sanitary fittings and drainage connections and removal of ceiling tiles. The rateable value of the property prior to the works was listed as £102,000. The owners argued that the property should be listed as a building undergoing reconstruction, and the rateable value should be assessed at a nominal £1 amount - a substantial saving.

The court held that on the material valuation date, the property was in the process of redevelopment and no part of the property was capable of being occupied or used. In this instance, therefore, the repair assumption did not replace the presumption of reality, and the rating list valuation should therefore be altered to reflect reality.

Most Read

It will be a matter of objective fact in each case whether a property is simply in disrepair (and therefore the repair assumption should be used by the valuation officer) or whether a property is undergoing redevelopment and should be valued using the reality principle. The valuation officer will have regard to the physical state of the property on the relevant day and also any programme of works being undertaken.

Susie Wynne is a partner in Willans’ commercial property department, with a particular emphasis on development projects, property finance and investment, renewable energy and telecoms agreements. A City-trained solicitor, she has over 20 years’ experience acting for banks, national retailers, companies and private investors. Susie is rated in leading directory Chambers UK and sources say she is “always extremely professional and can be relied upon to give sound, realistic advice.”

Willans is a full-service law firm noted for giving expert, practical and personal service. The firm’s highly regarded lawyers have a range of specialisms and advise national as well as local businesses, charities & not-for-profit organisations, international corporations and individuals.

Comments powered by Disqus